Hosting and publishing a single website on a web server is pretty straightforward. However when it comes to publishing multiple web sites on a single server, there are a few ways to go about it, each with its own pros and cons.
Understanding these options will allow you not only host standards compliant websites but also publish them successfully through Forefront TMG.
When you install Fastvue TMG Reporter, you are installing a web application running on top of Microsoft IIS. Although you do not need to know how to administer IIS websites to use TMG Reporter, this article may be useful in increasing your understanding of hosting IIS websites, and also publishing them to the public Internet using Forefront TMG.
Every service offered or hosted by a server must be uniquely addressable. This is normally achieved by assigning different port numbers to the various services. TCP/IP packets contain the IP address and the destination port number. This ensures that the request is handled by the correct service. In this way, a single server can host multiple services such as RDP on port 3389, DNS on port 53, Telnet on port 23 and so on.
Hosting multiple web sites on a single server presents a problem as you now have a duplicate service. The way to work around this is to have an alternative binding for each web site. The bindings provide the mechanism for making each site a unique service.
There are three methods for biding a site.
These binding are made at the site level through the Microsoft IIS Management Console.
Microsoft IIS is the web server that comes with Windows. It is installed as part of the Web Server role in Windows Server editions, or can be 'turned on' as a feature in Windows Desktop editions (vista, 7, 8 etc).
Using non-standard port numbers as a binding method introduces a few issues and is not frequently recommended. Port numbers are regulated and need to be assigned correctly. Contrary to popular belief they cannot just arbitrarily be picked at random to host multiple web sites. Port numbers are assigned based on three ranges:
If you are wondering why you do not normally have to specify a port number when accessing a website, the answer is pretty simple. Since the standard for HTTP is port 80 all browsers automatically add the port number in the request. The same is true for HTTPS running on port 443.
Typically when sites are hosted in this manner, the server's DNS name is used. When using unique port binding, the DNS to IP to Site ratio is 1 to 1 to many.
Adding an additional IP address to the web server allows you to again create a unique service by binding each site to its own IP address. Adding additional IP addresses to the server can lead to duplicate DNS entries and other routing related issues, but these are very well documented and easy to mitigate.
When using IP address bindings, a DNS record needs to be created for each site and refer to the correct binding.
When using IP address binding the DNS to IP to Site Ratio is 1 to 1 to 1
One of the most common binding methods is binding by hostname. Using hostname bindings you can serve multiple sites on a single IP on standard ports. IIS interprets the hostname from the HTTP host header and directs the traffic to the correct web site. Unlike binding on port number or IP address that uses Transport layer differentiation, binding by hostname uses the Application layer.
This means that you have multiple DNS entries referring to the same IP address.
The DNS to IP to Site Ratio is typically many to 1 to many
The way the bindings are implemented on the server affects the way these sites are published to the Internet through Forefront TMG.
As public IPs are limited you would want to use a single IP for as many sites as possible. And since arbitrary port numbers are typically blocked by corporate firewalls, you would want to use port 80 and 443.
This really only leaves host headers as the viable method to publish multiple sites.
The way this is accommodated in Forefront TMG is by creating a single web listener tied to a single public IP address but with multiple DNS names. This common listener can now be used by multiple web publishing rules to publish the various sites.
The Public Names tab in the web publishing rule allows you to specify which external public domain names correlate to the respective internal site.
Forefront TMG allows you to bridge different port numbers. This effectively converts traffic running on one port to another. This allows you to serve a site to the public Internet on port 80 while it might be running internally on port 8888.
When using port number binding you will also need to have a separate rule per site. This is because even though you can have a common listener the destinations ports have to be explicitly defined.
Forefront TMG allows traffic to be forwarded to a name but it also allows you to manually specify an override IP address. In this case, since traffic will always be directed to a unique IP address, you will also need a separate rule per site.
Forefront TMG allows you to forward the original host header information. This allows you to use a single rule to publish multiple sites. By enabling the Forward the original host header... option, Forefront TMG will pass on the host header it received from the client to your internal web server. The Microsoft IIS site will need to have host header binding to match this.
Things gets a bit more involved when it comes to using HTTPS. This is because one of the features of HTTPS is certificate-based host validation. In other words, the host header needs to match the certificate. The main limitation here is that only one certificate can be used per IP address on a Forefront TMG web listener.
To securely publish multiple sites on a single external IP, you need to use a multi-domain or SAN certificate that is valid for all hostnames.
The same complication also exists on the web server side. When using multiple SSL sites, unique bindings can only be made per IP address. It is best to use multiple single domain certificates, one per IP. Since internal IPs are not normally limited, this is not an issue.
Depending on your deployment requirements, there are several ways to publish sites using Microsoft IIS and Forefront TMG. Understanding these options along with their limitations and consequences helps you to choose the best method.
When possible I prefer to host every web site on a unique internal IP. In the bindings, I also bind the hostname to that IP address for HTTP. This makes the HTTPS binding straight forward as well. It also adds to security as it limits the allowed hostnames served by IIS.
When publishing the internal site to the Internet I also prefer to keep a unique internal IP and unique web publishing rule.
So the golden ratio is 1 Public DNS Name to 1 Public IP to 1 Internal DNS name to 1 Internal IP to 1 internal site.
This provides maximum flexibility but also requires the most IPs. If you have IPs to spare then this tends to be the best approach.
Download our FREE 30-day trial, or schedule a demo and we'll show you how it works.
Make The World A Better Place with Fastvue and Microsoft Reputation Services (MRS)
How to Report on YouTube Activity with Fastvue TMG Reporter